In the Web Marketing universe, qualitative data is often seen as the poor cousin of quantitative data. Information that can’t be reduced to a spreadsheet (or better yet, a graph or chart) isn’t trusted. It’s treated with skepticism, even derision.
It’s easy to understand why. Many practitioners have technical-leaning backgrounds, where precision is king. And so, “Data-driven” marketing is code for analytics and testing-driven marketing. (Where “testing” is defined as A/B and multivariate testing, i.e. backed up with statistics. Traditional usability testing just isn’t part of the game plan.)
Well, I’m a fan of data-driven marketing too. But there’s more than one type of data. Can’t we make room for others?
The Case for Parallel Data Collection
I appreciate the value of quantitative data. But it can only take you so far. Though it’s great for identifying problems, when it comes to finding solutions to those problems, it often falls short.
Take a simple example: A review of site analytics reveals that far too many visitors are bouncing from an important page. That’s definitely good to know!
But why are they bouncing? And how do you fix it? Sorry, but your graphs and charts and spreadsheets may not tell you that.
“Run some conversion tests”, you say? Great idea. But how do you decide what changes to test?
To gain the insights needed for solutions, don’t be afraid to look to qualitative data. Things like:
“Data-Driven” marketing doesn’t have to mean “spreadsheet-driven” marketing. There’s room for a healthy sprinkling of qualitative data, and (dare I say it?) even creative hunches.
Google announced on April 23 that it will again delay third-party cookie deprecation (3PCD) in…
Funnel reports have long been one of the most actionable reports in a marketing analyst’s…
GA4’s Monetization reports provide organizations with simple but actionable views into the revenue-generating aspects of…
This website uses cookies.